CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

July 2014

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Judy Trogadis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Jul 2014 15:58:07 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Thank you, that's very helpful. I wonder whether Cargille is reading this posting :-)

Judy


-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hillary Guzik
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 11:36 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: immersion oil

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

We actually just ran into this problem at out lab as well. We found that the cargille 
has a strong moth ball like odor. The general consensus was that we could not deal 
with the odor. The closest oil that cargille carries with out the odor has background 
fluorescence. After our test (with confocal and widefield / on multiple brand 
microscope (zeiss, olympus, and leica) ) we found that the zeiss oil has the best 
performance overall for all of the microscope. We did not have leica oil to test. We 
tested the delta vision, zeiss, olympus, and two cargille oils. 
Hope this helps. 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2