Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:03:50 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Hi Cam,
We operate a Bio-Rad Radiance 2100 confocal using XP, using the Zeiss
Lasersharp version 6.x with no problems, although it was a Zeiss engineer
that did the upgrade and install for us. It's been working fine ever since.
Cheers,
Graham
>
> Howdy List,
>
> I was wondering of anyone out there has had any
> experience using the BioRad Lasersharp 2000 software on an operating
> system a bit more modern that NT 4.0? I have done a bit of googleing
> and can not find any info.
>
>
>
> The reason for asking this is that we are looking at upgrading our old
> MRC1024 with some shiny new solid state lasers. But there would not be
> much point in this if there is no upgrade path for the software as well.
> Our current computer with NT 4.0 on it is working fine, but when it
> eventually gives in we will have to upgrade it. The problem with that
> is that NT is not going to like a great majority of the current run
> hardware in a brand new system.
>
>
>
> The only other alternative I can see is to run a Virtual Machine of NT
> 4.0 on a new computer system but I would like to avoid that if possible.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
>
>
> Cam
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Cameron Nowell* B. Sc (Hons)
>
>
>
> Microscopy Imaging and Research Core Facility
>
> Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
>
> 7 St Andrews Place
>
> East Melbourne, Victoria 3002
>
> AUSTRALIA
>
>
>
> *Phone:* +61396561242
>
> *Mobile**:* +61422882700
>
> *Fax:* +61396561411
>
|
|
|