CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

November 2001

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kathy Spencer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 14:58:13 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
We had some problems with streptavidin finding endogenous biotin in mouse
tissues. For that reason, I prefer the antibodies
        Kathy



At 04:27 PM 11/16/01 -0600, you wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>I'm in search of flurecent dye for confocal imagine, need your advice.
>
>Probes provide Alexa488 conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG, there is also
>available of streptavidin conjugated Alexa488. What's the advantage and
>disadvantage between the two choice? What I am going to do is to detect the
>colocalization of two proteins in one type of cell in tissue (mice thyroid
>tissue). Another dye I chose is Alexa568. I have biotin labeled secondary
>antibody. I'd like to try streptavidin-Alexa488 to enhance the signal but
>also afraid this will enhance backgroud (the primary antibody is easy to get
>nonspecific staining). Thanks in advance for help!
>
>All the best!
>
>Kemin
>
>
Kathy Spencer
The Scripps Research Institute
10550 N. Torrey Pines Road
IMM 24
La Jolla, CA 92037
(858) 784-9372
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2