CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

May 1996

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Marshall (Chip) Montrose" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 May 1996 13:44:06 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
In reply to my request for ideas about the molecules which could produce
red autofluorescence (600-620 emission detected after 543 OR 488
excitation), both Glen Macdonald and Martin Wessendorf thought that
lipofucscin was a likely culprit. I have a possible glitch to throw into
this idea, because these are LIVE TISSUE experiments. No fixative. Do you
think lipofuscin would still contribute?
 
        Sorry to not provide this info in the original question...Chip
 
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
  Chip Montrose
   Johns Hopkins University     tel: 410-955-9681
    Ross 930                      FAX: (410) 955-9677
     720 Rutland Avenue            email: [log in to unmask]
      Baltimore, MD 21205
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

ATOM RSS1 RSS2