Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:29:10 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Martin and others,
sorry, I see that I should be more clear. Indeed the question is if
someone has experience in replacing a color camera by a combination of
multi-LED illumination and a monochrome camera.
We would prefer a monochrome camera, because this could then also be
used for efficient fluorescence imaging and we would not have to switch
between a color and a monochrome camera.
For fluorescence we are using regular epi-illumination, for LED pseudo
color we would use transmission illumination.
Thanks, jens
-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Martin Wessendorf
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 3:46 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: question: camera for macroscope
Dear Jens--
Rietdorf, Jens wrote:
> we are looking for suitable illumination & camera/s for our Leica Z6
> MacroFluo. It is used for both fluorescence and absorption contrast
> samples.
>
> Has anybody out there experience with LED illumination in combination
> with a monochrome camera to generate 'true color' images?
Clever idea! Sounds as if it'd work nicely for transmitted illumination
and tinctorial staining. However, unless I'm misunderstanding you, I
don't think it would work as well for fluorescence, since the emission
wavelengths observed would be a function of the molecule rather than the
excitation wavelength.
Good luck--
Martin Wessendorf
--
Martin Wessendorf, Ph.D. office: (612) 626-0145
Assoc Prof, Dept Neuroscience lab: (612) 624-2991
University of Minnesota Preferred FAX: (612) 624-8118
6-145 Jackson Hall, 321 Church St. SE Dept Fax: (612) 626-5009
Minneapolis, MN 55455 e-mail: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|