CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

May 2000

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"m.cannell" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 2 May 2000 09:11:11 +1200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
When PClamp was produced around the time of the Axopatch 1C they provided
source as well as full schematics of their system. This allowed us(me) to fix
think when they broke (those little tantalum capacitors mainly) . But the point
is that my 13 year old axopatch is alive and well and will continue for the
foreseeable future. The old software was, well not user friendly, I agree. But
compared to what else that was available (almost nothing) it was a major
improvement. It was slightly better that the graphical interface program I
wrote for data translation boards. But the real point is that I always found
Axon willing to help and gave information freely. They deserved their
phenomenal growth and I would by from them in preference.

Regards Mark

Dan Brown wrote:

> "m.cannell" wrote:
> >
> > Lutz Schaefer wrote:
> >
> > > <snipped> I don't think that any commercial company
> > > would ever release source code unless it is for the sole purpose of the
> > > product and can be supported as well.
> >
> > Ever heard of Axon Instruments?
> >
>
> Mark,
>
> What source code does Axon Instruments provide? I wasn't aware that they
> distribute source code to pClamp (either DOS or Windows), AIW, or any
> other application. I know that the file support pack for reading ABF
> files is distributed in source form.
>
> I'm in the industry, and my company has business dealings with Axon,
> among other companies.
>
> -- Dan
>
> --
> Dan Brown
> Bruxton Corporation
> http://www.bruxton.com
> 206 782-8862

ATOM RSS1 RSS2