CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

March 2000

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Grazyna M Tokarczyk <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:54:34 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (46 lines)
Logically the ingredient in the nail polish that could harm lens would be
the solvent. Once the prep is hardened and the solvent is gone - no harm
should be done...

Grazyna Tokarczyk
Dept. Psychology and Neuroscience,
Dalhousie Univ,
Halifax, Canada

On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Irina Solovei wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Coming back to the discussion about sealing of coverslips I would like to
> mention two points.
>
> (1) We use for our slides not a nail polish but other cosmetic stuff, so
> called "base coat". It hardens quicker then a nail polish, it is
> colourless, and does not course bleaching of GFP in fixed cells - at least
> it is not a problem to scan them with CLSM.
>
> (2) In connection to the nail polish sealing, I recall my private
> discussions with microscopists about harmful effect of nailpolish on
> objective lenses. Do we really risk our very expensive lenses using sealed
> preps? Does anybody can comment on it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Irina
>
> ===========================
>           Dr.I.Solovei
>
>    Institute of Anthropology
>        and Humangetics
>    University of Munich (LMU)
>
>     Richard-Wagner-Str. 10/I
>     80333   Munich   Germany
> ===========================
> [log in to unmask]
>       tel.+49 (0)89 2180 6713
>       fax+49 (0)89 2180 6719
> ===========================
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2