CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

April 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SNR
From:
"MODEL, MICHAEL" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:30:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines) 
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Maybe I am misunderstanding your question, but if you are interested in
SNR why do you need beads? Cannot you just measure SNR for a comparable
signal coming from something larger than a bead? 

Mike Model

-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Sarah Kefayati
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 4:41 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: SNR

Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Dear all,

I appreciate if you help  me to figure out how I can calculate the SNR
from the data that I obtain by imaging the fluorescent beads in
different depths.

Thanks
Sarah

ATOM RSS1 RSS2