CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

November 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Johan Henriksson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:00:58 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Martin Spitaler wrote:
> Just a note because WinXP-64bit discussions were on here before: Even
> if the software doesn't support 64 bit, it should run faster because
> the the 'virtual memory' the software is using (beyond 3GB) is
> actually stored in RAM rather than on the harddrive.
this sounds really off to me. virtual memory works by taking a block of
memory and putting it on the harddrive. the address does not change,
there will simply be nothing to where it points. hence virtual memory
*does not* extend your limit past 2gb or 3gb, whatever your OS has.

-- 
--
------------------------------------------------
Johan Henriksson
MSc Engineering
PhD student, Karolinska Institutet
http://mahogny.areta.org http://www.endrov.net

ATOM RSS1 RSS2