CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

October 2010

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nuno Moreno <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:31:52 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (125 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Hi,

We use the 20x and its really a workhorse!

I was told recently that the 20x from olympus has better response in red/infrared range than de 25x despite of the lower NA. Can anyone confirm this?

All the best,
Nuno Moreno, PhD
Head of Equipment Management
Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência
Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian
Tel . +351 4464538
Fax. +351 4407970





On Oct 19, 2010, at 5:33 AM, Adrian Smith wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Nikon also has a new 25x objective for multiphoton work - specifications look very similar to the Olympus  and it available without buying a complete system... however I've not had any feedback from actual users yet.
> 
> I'm hoping to be able to test one on our LaVision BioTec TriMScopes at some stage but haven't had any success getting that organised yet. 
> 
> We've had good results with the Olympus 20x NA 0.95 (standard and special IR versions). 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Adrian Smith
> Centenary Institute, Sydney, Australia
> 
> On 19/10/2010, at 10:16 AM, Cameron Nowell wrote:
> 
>> *****
>> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>> *****
>> 
>> Hi List,
>> 
>> Unfortunately the Olympus 25x is only sold as part of a complete system
>> (we have one and it has been great). But the older 20x XLumPlanFL works
>> pretty well too for visible and IR wavelengths and you should be able to
>> buy one of those separately.
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Cam
>> 
>> 
>> Cameron J. Nowell
>> Microscopy Manager 
>> Centre for Advanced Microscopy 
>> Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research 
>> PO Box 2008 
>> Royal Melbourne Hospital 
>> Victoria, 3050 
>> AUSTRALIA 
>> Office: +61 3 9341 3155 
>> Mobile: +61422882700 
>> Fax: +61 3 9341 3104 
>> Facility Website
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of Patty Jansma
>> Sent: Tuesday, 19 October 2010 6:07 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 20X objective for 2P work
>> 
>> *****
>> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>> *****
>> 
>> http://www.olympusamerica.com/seg_section/seg_pressDetails.asp?pressNo=6
>> 46
>> 
>> I think it may only be sold with the Flo-view1000MPE but does what you 
>> want.
>> 
>> Patty
>> 
>> On 10/18/2010 11:20 AM, Carl Boswell wrote:
>>> *****
>>> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>>> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>>> *****
>>> 
>>> Dear listers,
>>> We're currently on the search for a high NA water immersion 20x 
>>> objective to use for intravital 2P imaging.  As such, we need 
>>> something that does it all, short wavelength transmission for SHG and 
>>> long wavelength transmission for our Ti:Saph excitation source.  Any 
>>> thoughts on what folks use/have seen/would like to have/have heard 
>>> about would be appreciated.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> c
>>> 
>>> Carl A. Boswell, Ph.D.
>>> Molecular and Cellular Biology
>>> University of Arizona
>>> 520-954-7053
>>> FAX 520-621-3709
>> 
>> 
>> This communication is intended only for the named recipient and may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged or subject to copyright; the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd does not waive any rights if you have received this communication in error.
>> The views expressed in this communication are those of the sender and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2