CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

December 2010

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Werner <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:17:53 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

I was wondering if anybody can explain what qualitative difference  
exist, if any, between different brands of plain glass slides. For  
example, over on the Ted Pella page ( http://www.tedpella.com/histo_html/slides.htm 
  ), for a 2-box pack of 144 slides, the price varies from about $10  
for the Pella Economy Slides, all the way up to $40 or $60+ for Gold  
Seal or Corning slides.

My question is, is there any advantage or optical difference with the  
more expensive slides? Corning advertises theirs as "water white"  
glass, which I imagine implies something about the transmittance or  
refractive index, but I'm not sure.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2