CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

July 2011

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Martin Wessendorf <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:04:05 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Dear Pedro--

On 7/26/2011 9:26 AM, Pedro Almada wrote:

> If you are curious what it's for, it's for some of our users who image whole
> drosophila brains for structural information. Their common complaint is that
> half-way through their z-stack they loose image brightness until the last
> slices are barely visible. Clearing methods like Methyl salicilate aren't
> really adequate for neuronal structure I'm told, which leads me to consider
> this method.

This is a long shot, but is there any chance that they're over-staining 
their tissue?  If they're using high concentrations of their 
fluorophores, they may be absorbing most of the light in the top half of 
the tissue, leaving no photons for the bottom half.  Cutting back the 
concentration of secondary antibodies would be expected to improve 
penetration, if this were the case.

Good luck!

Martin Wessendorf

-- 
Martin Wessendorf, Ph.D.                   office: (612) 626-0145
Assoc Prof, Dept Neuroscience                 lab: (612) 624-2991
University of Minnesota             Preferred FAX: (612) 624-8118
6-145 Jackson Hall, 321 Church St. SE    Dept Fax: (612) 626-5009
Minneapolis, MN  55455                    e-mail: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2