CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

May 2012

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Herzmark <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 12 May 2012 18:02:21 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Esteban,

I am curious what kind of sample you expose for 30-60 seconds? Won't
background fluorescence kill you?

Paul Herzmark
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology
University of California, Berkeley


On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 2:28 PM, G. Esteban Fernandez <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> Hi all,
>
> 1)  I'm curious how much time, roughly, it takes for a Peltier-cooled
> CCD camera to reach the lowest temperature.  Are we talking a few
> minutes or closer to an hour or more?  I have several brands of cooled
> CCDs of different vintages and I'm just looking for a "rule of thumb",
> if possible.
>
> 2) I do plan to test my cameras myself:  I was thinking of imaging a
> timelapse of a dim & stable specimen (requiring something like 30-60
> sec. exposure) after turning cooling on to see at what time noise
> reaches a minimum.  Any suggestions for other ways to test this are
> welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Esteban
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2