CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

January 2013

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:19:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Here is a very nice summary of the ins and outs of aldehyde fixation:

http://publish.uwo.ca/~jkiernan/formglut.htm 

Sincerely,
Will 

-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Kathryn Spencer
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 1:11 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Glutaraldehyde and sodium borohydride reduction

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Hello;
	Please indulge a cell biologist trying to understand chemistry...
	We are discussing the differences between glutaraldehyde and
formaldehyde fixation for immunofluorescence. When fixing with
glutaraldehyde (0.1% glut with 3% PFA), we follow the fixation with sodium
borohydride reduction. I understand that this converts the unused aldehyde
groups to unreactive hydroxyls. Why is this step not required for
formaldehyde fixation? Merely because PFA has one aldehyde group and Glut
has two on the ends exposed after polymerization?
	Thanks.
	Kathy


Kathryn R. Spencer, PhD
The Scripps Research Institute
10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, DNC 210
La Jolla, CA 92037

ATOM RSS1 RSS2