Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:34:57 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****
A note of caution concerning the sequential imaging approach, 930->1040
or 850->1000: Most objectives won't be color corrected in that range, so
it is quite possible that the excitation with these two wavelengths may
be several microns apart in z.
For testing this, I'd recommend quantum dots dried on a glass surface:
Excitable with any wavelength and giving a bright signal, of which the
peak is easy to determine in a z-stack. I used 665 nm emission dots, but
others should work to.
Steffen
On 02.07.2013 10:18, Tobias Rose wrote:
(deleted)
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Steffen Dietzel, PD Dr. rer. nat
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Walter-Brendel-Zentrum für experimentelle Medizin (WBex)
Head of light microscopy
Mail room:
Marchioninistr. 15, D-81377 München
Building location:
Marchioninistr. 27, München-Großhadern
|
|
|