*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****
Hi all,
Does anyone think it would be possible to tabulate a ıspeed limit' for the
various options discussed? I know it sounds near impossible to come up
with a standard basis for comparison, but letıs say something
approximating a 512x512 acquisition either fixed or or a volume that
includes 10 z steps (e.g., using a piezo stage when relevant). It would
be great to have an order of magnitude idea how to compare technologies
like a resonant scanner, Optera-type swept field scanner, spinning disc,
VCS super-spinning disc or light sheet instrument when FPS is a major
priority and excitation light is not limiting. Maybe we could crowdsource
it from what users actually get in practice.
All the best,
Tim
Timothy Feinstein, Ph.D. | Manager, Core for
Confocal Microscopy and Quantitative Imaging
333 Bostwick Ave., N.E., Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503
Phone: 616-234-5819 | Email: [log in to unmask]
On 12/30/14, 2:36 AM, "Andrea Latini" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>*****
>To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=129&d=09ai1Hwf389A_JSBGnaEcBqKN1nFKNqOL1R
>ax-qpJw&u=http%3a%2f%2flists%2eumn%2eedu%2fcgi-bin%2fwa%3fA0%3dconfocalmic
>roscopy
>Post images on
>http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=129&d=09ai1Hwf389A_JSBGnaEcBqKN1nFKNqOLwF
>bleD9dw&u=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2eimgur%2ecom and include the link in your
>posting.
>*****
>
>Dear Andrew,
>the VCS (Video Confocal Super Resolution), module is an X-Light Spinning
>disk system
>add-on.
>the disk is out of the optical path when in VCS mode (i.e. 'bypass' mode).
>basically, it's a new implementation of structured illumination
>technology aimed to fast
>image acquisition with no resolution limitations that are spinning disk
>related.
>
>I'll be pleased to discuss more, please get in touch.
>
>Regards.
>
>Andrea
>[log in to unmask]
>
>
>On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 16:58:15 -0500, Andrew York
><[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>>*****
>>To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>>http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=129&d=09ai1Hwf389A_JSBGnaEcBqKN1nFKNqOL1
>>Rax-qpJw&u=http%3a%2f%2flists%2eumn%2eedu%2fcgi-bin%2fwa%3fA0%3dconfocalm
>>icroscopy
>>Post images on
>>http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=129&d=09ai1Hwf389A_JSBGnaEcBqKN1nFKNqOLw
>>FbleD9dw&u=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2eimgur%2ecom and include the link in your
>>posting.
>>*****
>>
>> Is there information available about this product? Is this an
>>implementation of Enderlein's spinning disk paper? Also, 80 nm seems...
>>optimistic? Is this with very short wavelength light, or just a slightly
>>different definition of resolution than I'm used to?
>>
>>On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Andrea Latini <[log in to unmask]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> *****
>>> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>>>
>>>http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=129&d=09ai1Hwf389A_JSBGnaEcBqKN1nFKNqOL
>>>1Rax-qpJw&u=http%3a%2f%2flists%2eumn%2eedu%2fcgi-bin%2fwa%3fA0%3dconfoca
>>>lmicroscopy
>>> Post images on
>>>http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=129&d=09ai1Hwf389A_JSBGnaEcBqKN1nFKNqOL
>>>wFbleD9dw&u=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2eimgur%2ecom and include the link in your
>>>posting.
>>> *****
>>>
>>> - commercial response
>>>
>>> thanks for reporting your experience with our Confocals Marco.
>>>
>>> the new Video Super Resolution module for XLight allows for 50ms
>>>exposure
>>> time and <1
>>> second, 80nm spatial resolution; this is possible with large Cuda
>>> programming we've been
>>> developing during past months and introduced @SfN 2014 as a product.
>>>
>>> soon on our website and in your Lab, hopefully!
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>> Andrea
>>>
>>> CrestOptics
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>
|
