Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 12 Nov 2015 02:04:38 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****
Hi Neil,
in my hands and on the SP5 we have in our facility I always had some doubts
using the HyD for colocalization: when I analyze the scatter plot in the
colocalization analisys of the Leica software, the pixels of the HyD channel
do not have an even distribution; they are concentrated only in certain
values of the full bit range. I don't know if this is due to the different
gain of the Hyd (used in standard mode) but I feel this effect could affect
the standard colocalization factors that you calculate (Perasons Overlap, ...).
Anyway I never tried a PMT vs HyD direct comparison.
My two cents
Max
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 01:59:29 +0000, Anthony, Neil <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>*****
>To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
>*****
>
>Hi all, I hope the scopes are treating you well.
>
>I wonder if anybody has any thoughts on using Leica HyD detectors for
colocalization. If one was forced to colocalize a HyD channel to a PMT
channel, how would this affect the results when compared to a PMT-PMT coloc?
I'm assuming here that both channels would have the same bit-depth.
>
>Thanks in advance for your time.
>
>Neil
>
>
>________________________________
>
>This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
>the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
>information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
>recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
>or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
>prohibited.
>
>If you have received this message in error, please contact
>the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
>original message (including attachments).
|
|
|