CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

August 1997

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jonathan Bard <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Aug 1997 08:05:04 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
>Jonathan,
>
>so far noone on the list seems to have a suggestion what stain you
>could use. I was wondering if your problem is low contrast of your
>material under bright field conditions and whether that this is the
>reason why you want the counterstain. If this is the case you could
>try DIC or Phase contrast, which greatly improve contrast in
>specimen. As I understand you work with fixed material, consequently
>the time delay between subsequent images caused by switching between
>different set ups would not matter.
>Probably your microscope has a cameraport so that you can obtain
>photographs of your bright field images and match them with the
>fluorescent images gathered on the confocal.
>Is this a reasonable suggestion?

Thanks for the suggestion.

Unfortunately, we need to to use automated image analysis/3D reconstruction
techniques and need some good boundary detail

and my fluorescent microscope lacks DIC/phase (actually, I have it, but
can't use it at the same time as fluorescence - dammit - old-fashioned
system!)

Plus we use a digital camera system

But the point is well taken - if I stop down the condenser diaphragm, I may
get sufficent contrast for my purposes - I'll try it.

Thanks again,

Jonathan

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

                      Jonathan Bard

Anatomy Department, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK

Telephone (44) (0)131.650.3107    Fax: (44) (0)131.650.6545

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

ATOM RSS1 RSS2