CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

July 1996

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Robert J. Palmer Jr." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 1 Jul 1996 08:05:57 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
>Dear list
>
>if one wants to avoid using DAPI (because of autofluorescence), what other
>alternatives, with as much similar properties to DAPI as possible, do
>exist?
>
>Thanks
>
>********************** PLEASE NOTE NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS ************************
>
>Stamatis Pagakis                                          [log in to unmask]
>University Laboratory of Physiology          [log in to unmask]
>University of Oxford, Parks Rd.              FAX:  +44 (0)1865 272469
>Oxford OX1 3PT,   United Kingdom             Tel:  +44 (0)1865 272551
 
Many general nucleic acid stains exist, especially if you are willing to
move to visible light as the exicitation source.  See the Molecular Probes
catalogue for detailed info, but if you must keep UV excitation, try
Hoechst 33258 or 33342, or trimethylpsoralin.
Rob Palmer
CEB/UT

ATOM RSS1 RSS2