CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

May 2003

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Karl Garsha <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 May 2003 09:13:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Greetings,
Has anybody determined a benchmark for evaluating PMT sensitivity on the
SP-2 platform?  I've recently discovered that our PMT 1 is showing
roughly 30% of the sensitivity of PMT 3 and PMT 2 is showing 65% of the
sensitivity of PMT 3 (at either end of the spectrum).  This is a little
alarming and I would like to determine whether PMT 3 is in fact
performing well or if the sensitivity is down for it as well.  Thanks in
advance for any suggestions.
Cheers,
Karl G.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2