Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi,
Does any one know about staining for Hydrogen peroxide in the plant and
observing it with confocal.
Shetty
>>> [log in to unmask] 8/17/2004 11:00:06 AM >>>
Hi Bob,
Aluminium alloys expand at around 23 microns per degree C for every
meter of material. This makes it important that the equipment is
aligned
and used at the same stabilised temperature. This is not always easy
to
achieve. It can be especially difficult during long automated
processes.

Regards,
Robert.


-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On
Behalf Of Robert Zucker
Sent: 16 August 2004 18:40
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Confocal Instability-shocking observation





Confocal Users
How stable is the alignment in your confocal microscopy system? Does
the
beam wander or are the mechanical components affected by heat?

We Tested our Leica SP1 spectral system with a LightForm lamp as
described our MM 2004 abstract and in a tutorial review on
spectroscopic
imaging to be published in Cytometry (in press) " Calibration and
Validation of Confocal Imaging System." The test measures spectral
registration of defined peaks between 400-650 using the LightForm
Spectral Lamp.

Morning: The system showed that PMT 1and PMT 2 were excellent, with
sharp narrow wavelength reference spectra peaks. PMT 3 had less
resolution than the other two for an unknown reason.
Late Afternoon: Strange image data recorded in PMT 2 below the
647-excitation line while measuring TOPRO-3 (PMT3) and Alexa 568 (PMT
2)
-Possible reflections were occurring in the detecting region assigned
to
PMT 2.

We next tested the three PMTs in system with LightForm lamp.  It was
observed that PMT 1 and PMT 3 were identical to the morning values.
PMT
2 shifted 5nm to lower wavelength values and the FWHM of the peaks
were
now very broad. This suggests that resolution was lost using this PMT
2
(our best PMT in the morning). We put sliders over the laser line and
found the unusable range below the laser lines to be 8nm (488)
16nm(568)
and 32nm (647).  They supposedly should be 7nm or less.

How is this occurring?  Why is the system going out of calibration?
Must
we test at multiple times in the day to insure a calibrated system?
How
would you test for laser or machine drift on your confocal machine? It
is a shocking observation that other confocal users need to be aware
of,
as the ramifications are very serious for good reproducible data.
Let's
discuss this confocal instability on this user group.

PS-Same effect observed about 5 different times on our machine over a
2-year period and at least twice on another machine located in a
different geographical area. We do not check for this problem all the
time. Do You?

Best wishes
Bob

Robert M. Zucker, PhD
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory
Reproductive Toxicology Division, MD 72
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711
Tel: 919-541-1585; fax 919-541-4017
e-mail: [log in to unmask]

Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and
not necessarily Genetix Ltd (Genetix) or any company associated with it.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely
for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended
recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and
that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in
error please notify Genetix by telephone on +44 (0)1425 624600.


The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message
is strictly forbidden. This mail and any attachments have been scanned
for viruses prior to leaving the Genetix network. Genetix will not be
liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages as a
result of any virus being passed on, or arising from alteration of the
contents of this message by a third party.