WEBSTANDARDS Archives

May 2011

WEBSTANDARDS@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dan Sagisser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
UofMN Web Standards <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 May 2011 14:09:54 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1065 bytes) , text/html (1680 bytes)
I always feel like the information out of Google Analytics is more
approachable than urchin, but that's largely because of the interface.  It
sounds like they upgraded it though, which would make my life much easier.

Just my 2 cents.

-Dan

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:44 AM, John Starr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am trying to determine if we want to upgrade our webstats software from
> it current version, Urchin 6 to the latest version Urchin 7.  With that in
> mind, I would like to know what you see as short comings of the current
> version or what reports / features you would need to make the webstats more
> valuable to you.  If you'd like to see what Google advertises as Urchin 7
> features, you can look at http://www.google.com/urchin/features.html
>
> Thanks for your feedback,
>
> John
>
> --
> John Starr
> Business Analyst
> Office of Information Technology - Point Solutions
> University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
> (612) 624-3668
>



-- 
Dan Sagisser
Information Architect and Project Manager
College of Education and Human Development
Phone: 612-626-1325
www.cehd.umn.edu


ATOM RSS1 RSS2