WEBSTANDARDS Archives

UofMN Web Standards

WEBSTANDARDS@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
UofMN CSS Web Development <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Date:
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:02:53 -0600
Reply-To:
UofMN CSS Web Development <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
manda lo <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
playing around.

i'm [log in to unmask]

manda

Patrick Haggerty wrote:
> Hey John,
> 
> Interested in being Google Wave buddies?  I just sent my Wave address to 
> the Dev Group, but I'll give you it here:
> 
> 
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Pat
> 
> ---------------------------------------
> Patrick Haggerty
> 
> Office of Information Technology
>     University of Minnesota     
> 
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Phone: 612-626-5807
> 
> 
> On 11/3/09 10:47 AM, John Brian Becker wrote:
>> [log in to unmask]
>>
>> I just received my Google Wave invite a few days ago. If there are any 
>> in progress University of Minnesota Google Waves, I would like to be 
>> added to those waves.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> JB
>>
>> John Brian Becker
>> 220 Cooke Hall
>> School of Kinesiology
>> 612.625.1007
>>
>> David Naughton wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> How about if those of us on Wave share our addresses? I'm [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:36:28AM -0500, Tony Thomas wrote:
>>>   
>>>> I'm not sure how many of us at the U have preview access to Google  
>>>> Wave yet, but it might be interesting to try to set up a Wave for the  
>>>> Web Dev meetings as a way to discuss the meeting topics and follow up  
>>>> with resources, links & etc. from the presenters. There may not be  
>>>> time to get it going today, but perhaps at a future meeting.
>>>>
>>>> I've had the opportunity to use Wave for real-time collaboration  
>>>> recently. It's handy, even if still a little buggy.
>>>>
>>>> My thought was one Wave per meeting. The Twin Cities Wave has been  
>>>> fun, but has grown into monster. There's something to be said for  
>>>> limiting the subject matter IMO.
>>>>     
>>>
>>>   

ATOM RSS1 RSS2