Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:02:53 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
playing around.
i'm [log in to unmask]
manda
Patrick Haggerty wrote:
> Hey John,
>
> Interested in being Google Wave buddies? I just sent my Wave address to
> the Dev Group, but I'll give you it here:
>
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Pat
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Patrick Haggerty
>
> Office of Information Technology
> University of Minnesota
>
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Phone: 612-626-5807
>
>
> On 11/3/09 10:47 AM, John Brian Becker wrote:
>> [log in to unmask]
>>
>> I just received my Google Wave invite a few days ago. If there are any
>> in progress University of Minnesota Google Waves, I would like to be
>> added to those waves.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> JB
>>
>> John Brian Becker
>> 220 Cooke Hall
>> School of Kinesiology
>> 612.625.1007
>>
>> David Naughton wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> How about if those of us on Wave share our addresses? I'm [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:36:28AM -0500, Tony Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm not sure how many of us at the U have preview access to Google
>>>> Wave yet, but it might be interesting to try to set up a Wave for the
>>>> Web Dev meetings as a way to discuss the meeting topics and follow up
>>>> with resources, links & etc. from the presenters. There may not be
>>>> time to get it going today, but perhaps at a future meeting.
>>>>
>>>> I've had the opportunity to use Wave for real-time collaboration
>>>> recently. It's handy, even if still a little buggy.
>>>>
>>>> My thought was one Wave per meeting. The Twin Cities Wave has been
>>>> fun, but has grown into monster. There's something to be said for
>>>> limiting the subject matter IMO.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
|
|
|