I support waving (too soon to use it as a verb?) during the 
meeting...but I'd be extremely distracted a projection of it...and I'd 
also be overwhelmed with jealousy, having not yet received an invite! -Jake


Tom Stanoch wrote:
> [log in to unmask] .  I only see a benefit to Google Wave when 
> more people have access to it.  Right now I only have a couple 
> contacts and there isn't much to do because they are contacts I don't 
> normally collaborate with.
>
> Tom Stanoch
>
> Tony Thomas wrote:
>> Good idea: [log in to unmask]
>>
>> On Oct 22, 2009, at 9:42 AM, David Naughton wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> How about if those of us on Wave share our addresses? I'm 
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:36:28AM -0500, Tony Thomas wrote:
>>>> I'm not sure how many of us at the U have preview access to Google
>>>> Wave yet, but it might be interesting to try to set up a Wave for the
>>>> Web Dev meetings as a way to discuss the meeting topics and follow up
>>>> with resources, links & etc. from the presenters. There may not be
>>>> time to get it going today, but perhaps at a future meeting.
>>>>
>>>> I've had the opportunity to use Wave for real-time collaboration
>>>> recently. It's handy, even if still a little buggy.
>>>>
>>>> My thought was one Wave per meeting. The Twin Cities Wave has been
>>>> fun, but has grown into monster. There's something to be said for
>>>> limiting the subject matter IMO.
>
> -- 
>
> *Tom Stanoch*
> University of Minnesota Extension
> 405 Coffey Hall, St. Paul, MN 55108
> UM Jabber IM: [log in to unmask]
>