CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

March 2000

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"RAHBARI, RAMIN" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Mar 2000 09:27:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
I would agree w/ Beat.  I would consider concentrations above 5µg/ml a
terminal but not fatal staining concentration.  At 5µg/ml hepatocytes can be
monitored temporally for 8 hours w/o deleterious effects from the dye.  

Ramin Rahbari
PARKE-DAVIS Pharmaceutical Research
Worldwide Preclinical Safety
2800 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor,  MI  48105
Voice         (734) 622-3383
Fax           (734) 622-5001
[log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: Beat Ludin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2000 6:33 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Visible DNA Stain, Hoechts or DAPI?


I've been using Hoechst 33342 at 100-200ng/ml. In my tests, this
concentration did not noticeably impair growth of mammalian
fibroblastic and epithelial cell lines over a period of 4 days.
(5-10ug/ml of as proposed by Ramin will act as a mitotic blocker as
far as I remember. I didn't do the experiment myself, though, and I
don't remember the reference).

Cheers,

        Beat


LIFE IMAGING SERVICES
               - visit our web site at http://www.lis.ch
+-----------------------------------------------------------
| Dr. B. Ludin
| Life Imaging Services     fon ++41 (0)79 235 7154
| Muehletalweg 22           fax ++41 (0)860 622 963 160
| CH-4600 Olten             [log in to unmask]
| Switzerland               http://www.lis.ch

ATOM RSS1 RSS2