CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

August 2000

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Robert Zucker <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Aug 2000 17:15:20 -0400
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
We have compared a sample stained with Lysotracker red ( optimally excited at
568)   on a Zeiss 510 with a HENE 543 (.5mw laser) and an  Argon Krypton laser
in a Leica TSC-SP1. The power measured on a stage with the equivalent 5x lens
was approximately  .3mw with a Zeiss unit and 1.5mw with a Leica unit. There was
sufficient excitation with the Zeiss 510 unit to allow our sample to be
visualized . In fact the power had to be reduced as it saturated the PMT's. The
HENE has the advantage of having less noise than the argon -kypton laser. This
data has made me change my opinion on the necessity of a argon-kypton laser and
it seems that if the system has good optical transmission.  I would definitely
use a HENE laser in preference to a noisy argon-krypton laser.
Bob

Robert M. Zucker, PhD
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
MD 72
National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711
Tel: 919-541-1585; fax 919-541-4017
e-mail: [log in to unmask]



|--------+----------------------->
|        |          [log in to unmask]
|        |          ensu.ca      |
|        |                       |
|        |          08/28/00     |
|        |          02:11 PM     |
|        |          Please       |
|        |          respond to   |
|        |          CONFOCAL     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->
  >----------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                    |
  |       To:     [log in to unmask]   |
  |       cc:                                          |
  |       Subject:     Green HeNe laser power          |
  >----------------------------------------------------|






We are contemplating a Zeiss LSM510 and are trying to think through the
laser configuration.  They can only demo Option 1.

Option 1: Argon, Green HeNe, Red HeNe (457, 488, 512, 543, 633)
Option 2: Argon/Krypton, Red HeNe (or Red Diode) (488, 568, 633)
Option 3: Argon, Nd:YAG, Red HeNe (or Red Diode) (488, 532, 633)

Is a 1mW Green HeNe of any use in "typical" sample scenarios ie; not bright
actin or tonnes of GFP?  Is the 568 line of an Argon Krypton more useful
(power vs wavelength)?  What about a diode pumped Nd:YAG 20mW @ 532nm?

Any comments welcome.

- Derek Schulze

Flow Cytometry and Confocal Microscopy Core Facility
Cancer Research Labs
353 Botterell Hall
Queen's University
Kingston, Ontario
K7L 3N6
Canada

http://meds.queensu.ca/medicine/crl/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2