CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

September 2001

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Vergara, Leoncio A." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Sep 2001 14:47:43 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Nikon also sells the DXM1200 for about $7000 including acquisition software.
It is better than the coolpix for brightfield and also is easier to use. We
had problems using a coolpix camera with our Nikon E800, but the DXM1200
works really well. Neither of them are the best for fluorescence, but I am
sure that the DXM performs better than the coolpix for that application as
well.
You should also consider the Roper Coolsnap CF color which sells for about
$5000, but it does not include the software, there is also the basic color
Coolsnap model that costs $3500 but is much slower than the CF version.

-----Original Message-----
From: richard green [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:25 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Inexpensive Digital Cameras

Hi I just wanted to get some feed back from folks out
there... What are your recommendations on purchasing a
decent digital camera ( place on my Zeiss Microscope),
that I can plug directly into my PC (video card) , and
generate good bright field (as well as fluorescent
images ) and is there one out there that's around
5,000 dollars? I've thought about the Nikon CoolPix ,
any other suggestions?

-Richard Green


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2