CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

December 2001

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sarah Locknar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:08:24 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Hi-
We're looking into buying a new confocal / deconvolution scope and I'm wondering
if anyone has a feel for which gives a sharper, more detailed image assuming all
optics are otherwise the same (i.e. identical objectives and sample) - one
generated using a deconvolution microscope or one generated with a confocal
microscope which has then undergone a deconvolution algorithm.  Also, what sort
of deconvolution packages are out there, how long does data processing take and
what sort of price range are we talking about?
Thanks-
Sarah

----------------------------------------------------
Sarah Locknar, Ph.D.
Confocal Microscopy Coordinator
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology
University of Vermont
802-656-0413
----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2