CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

November 2002

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Patty Jansma <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:34:31 -0700
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

If you can afford the Deltavision system, it wonderful. It has thought
through and solved some of the problems that you need to deal with on less
expensive component systems. One limitation is that you are on an inverted
scope.

Regards,

Patty Jansma


At 11:50 AM 11/15/02 +0000, you wrote:
>Search the CONFOCAL archive at
>http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
>Our facility would like to purchase a dedicated live cell imaging system
>within the next year (and maybe even by March 2003). High resolution is very
>important to us so we have been looking closely at the Perkin Elmer
>UltraView spinning disc system. Does anyone have anyother suggestions or
>experiences they's like to share? How do you have your systems set up-
>incubation, temperature control? What criteria should we look for? What do
>people think of Applied Precision's DeltaVision in terms of resolution and
>overall?
>
>
>Thanks!!!
>
>Susan Puhalla
>Microscopy Research Assistant
>MRC Clinical Sciences Centre
>Room 5003
>Hammersmith Hospital
>DuCane Road
>London W12 ONN
>UK
>Telephone: 020 8383 8528
>[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2