Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:53:41 +0100 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Dear Patty,
I routinely use 293HEK cells. They have a bit of autofluorescence (mainly
green) fixing either with 4% paraformaldehyde or cold acetone. For each
experiment I always set up a control slide in which I omit the primary and
secondary antibodies. I consider such a signal background due to
autofluorescence of the cells. I get a rid of the autofluorescence signal
by using the black level control. Then, I will use these settings to
acquire all the images of that experiment.
I hope this helps.
Francesca
At 14:31 29/04/03 -0400, you wrote:
>Search the CONFOCAL archive at
>http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
>Has anyone had experience getting rid of autofluorescence from 293
>cells? Two of my colleagues are trying to perform immunofluorescence on
>293 cells transfected with WISP3 and LRP5 respectively. However, the
>control cells and transfected cells have high levels of
>autofluorescence. Has anyone else experienced this with this cells
>line? Any suggestions on how to get rid of the background staining?
>Both colleagues see this with paraformaledehyde and methanol fixation
>protocols, and the cells have been blocked with BSA and/or serum.
>Thanks,
>
>Patty Conrad
>621 BRB/Dept. of Genetics
>CWRU School of Medicine
>10900 Euclid Ave
>Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4955
>
>Phone: (216) 368-0305
>FAX: (216) 368-3432
--------------------------------------------------------------
Francesca Magnani
Biochemistry Department
Trinity College
Dublin 2
Ireland
phone: 00353 1 6082445
fax: 00353 1 6772400
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|