CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

January 2004

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:37:48 +1100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

There really isn't too much trouble tracking moving objects in
phase or DIC provided nothing else is moving.  Just subtract each'
image from the previous one and changes are obvious - no need to
do any segmentation.

                                                    Guy Cox



> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> >Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> >http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
> >
> >Dear All
> >
> >It is quite true that there are a number of softwares with which one can
> >perform tracking. My main problem is that for the segmentation of the
> >images these usually use tresholding which may work nicely for
> >fluorescent images but fails often when phase contrast images of cell
> >should be tracked. So my question is whether anyone is aware of a
> >software with which one can automatically track phase contrast (or DIC)
> >images of cells with minimal operator interference. Obviously in this
> >case only in 2D...
> >
> >Thanks   Gabor
> >
> >--
> >Gabor Csucs, PhD
> >Light Microscopy Center
> >Institute of Biochemistry
> >Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETHZ
> >
> >tel     +41 1 633 6221
> >        +41 1 633 6196                 ETH Hönngerberg
> >fax     +41 1 633 1124                 CH-8093 Zürich
> >email   [log in to unmask]
> >www     http://www.biol.ethz.ch
>
>
> Dear Gabor,
>
> I am not aware of such software.
>
> My suggestion is that you don't use Phase-Contrast (or DIC for that
> matter).
>
> If you want a single image that will show you RI
> changes, use dark field.  I know that doing this
> as NA >1 is difficult but I think that you will
> find that an NA 1.0 lens will give you a better
> and more easily interpretable image in dark field
> than a 1.2 NA phase of DIC setup on most living
> specimens.
>
> (doesn't work well on thick specimens with a lot
> of "out-of-focus" scattered light.)
>
> Jim P.
>
> --
>                ****************************************
> Prof. James B. Pawley,                             Ph.  608-263-3147
> Room 223, Zoology Research Building,               FAX  608-265-5315
> 1117 Johnson Ave., Madison, WI, 53706  [log in to unmask]
> "A scientist is not one who can answer questions but one who can
> question answers."  Theodore Schick Jr., Skeptical Enquirer, 21-2:39
>


--
Associate Professor Guy Cox
Electron Microscope Unit, F09
University of Sydney NSW 2006
+61 2 9351 3176

ATOM RSS1 RSS2