CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

June 2005

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 11 Jun 2005 03:45:31 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Personally, if I'm doing anything that matters (ie
not using either oil or very low mag) I use a lens
with a correction collar.  And I take the trouble to
set it correctly!  The difference I get between a
normal .75 NA plan fluorite and a .95NA plan apo
is enormous, and it's not the improvement in NA, nor
the better colour correction, it's the ability to
correct SA.  Quicker, easier and more accurate than
measuring coverslips.  Well worth the cost (which in
any case is minor if ordered as part of the original
microscope)

                                    Guy


> As slight topic drift here but... In general do people bother to measure
> every coverslip with a micrometer before you use it or do people do
> something else, eg. measure a few from a box, or assume that #1.5 are
> 170um?
>
> Ian
>


--
Associate Professor Guy Cox
Electron Microscope Unit,
University of Sydney,
NSW 2006, Australia

Phone:+61 2 9351 3176    Fax:+61 2 9351 7682
http://www.guycox.net

ATOM RSS1 RSS2