CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

November 2006

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
George McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:00:49 -0800
In-Reply-To:
<f06230901c178d5d9c169@[141.209.160.249]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (102 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Did they do the control of leaving out the cells entirely? Where did 
you publish?



At 04:58 AM 11/9/2006, you wrote:
>Search the CONFOCAL archive at
>http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
>Yeah, sounds wierd -- but what what I meant was the cells were dead 
>and they were getting action potentials, and the experiments were 
>continued long enough for the membranes to be lost also, not that 
>the action potentials were coming from dead cells with no membranes. 
>I wan't the only one who noticed this.
>Phil
>
>>Search the CONFOCAL archive at
>>http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>>
>>Hmm action potentials without membranes? I had better revise my 
>>teaching on the biophysics of  cells!
>>
>>LOL
>>
>>Cheers
>>
>>
>>Philip Oshel wrote:
>>
>>>  Search the CONFOCAL archive at
>>>  http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>>>
>>>  I'm not so sure about that. Action potentials can be gotten from 
>>> dead neurons. I worked in a lab once doing EM for a bunch of 
>>> neurophysiologists, and they routinely got action potentials not 
>>> only from dead brain slices, but also slilces where the neurons 
>>> had been dead long enough to lose their membranes. (Needless to 
>>> say, they never liked being told this.)
>>>
>>>  But, I think there's a typo here. Tino refers to "slice 
>>> preparation", which is a tissue sample thick enough to contain 
>>> living, intact cells, not to "slide preparation".
>>>
>>>  Phil
>>>
>>>
>>>>  Yes, but I don't quite understand what Tino means by
>>>>  slide preparations.  You'll only get a measure of
>>>>  membrane potential is the cells are intact and alive.
>>>>
>>>>                      Guy
>>>>
>>>>  moreno wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>   yes,
>>>>>   DI8-ANNEPS for example.
>>>>>   Tino Jaeger wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>   Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   is there any fluorescence dye, which can can be used to code for the
>>>>>>   membrane potential of cells (e.g. loading of the cells like 
>>>>>> with FURA-AM,
>>>>>>   and the then fluorescence intensity of the dye shows up the different
>>>>>>   voltage (membrane potential) of cells in a slice preparation)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Thanks for your help.
>>>>>>   Tino
>>>>
>>>>  -- ______________________________________________
>>>>  Associate Professor Guy Cox, MA, DPhil(Oxon)
>>>>  Electron Microscope Unit, Madsen Building F09,
>>>>  University of Sydney, NSW 2006
>>>>  ______________________________________________
>>>>  Phone +61 2 9351 3176     Fax +61 2 9351 7682
>>>>  Mobile 0413 281 861
>>>>  ______________________________________________
>>>>  http://www.guycox.net
>>>
>
>--
>Philip Oshel
>Microscopy Facility Supervisor
>Biology Department
>Central Michigan University
>024C Brooks Hall
>Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859
>voice: (989) 774-3576
>dept. fax: (989) 774-3462





George McNamara, Ph.D.
Glendale, CA
818-547-6909
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2