Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:30:13 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
My experience in cultured CV1 cells using confocal imaging is that the
intensity of untagged XFP in the nucleus is the same as that in the
cytoplasm. In wide-field it appears to accumulate because the nucleus is
thicker than the cytoplasm as the cell spreads. Tagging the molecule so it is
bigger than 40-45kDa results in exclusion from the nucleus in both imaging
modes.
Richard C. Kurten Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Physiology & Biophysics
UAMS College of Medicine
Co-Director, Lung Cell Biology Laboratory
Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute
Director, Digital and Confocal Microscopy Laboratory
Arkansas Cancer Research Center
Little Rock, Arkansas
UAMS: 501-686-8269 ACHRI: 501-364-2823
-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of F Javier Diez Guerra
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 11:09 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: GFP in nuclei
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Hi,
Anybody knows why EGFP (or any of its color
variants) concentrates at cell nuclei when expressed in eukaryotic cells?
I mean just EGFP, without any tag or fusion.
My experience with XFPs derived from A. Victoria is that they show
accumulation at cell nuclei.
Thanks
F Javier Diez-Guerra, PhD
Profesor Titular
Centro de Biologia Molecular Severo Ochoa Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad
Autónoma Ctra Colmenar Viejo Km 15 Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid SPAIN
phone: +34 91 4978051
Fax: +34 91 4978087
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
|
|
|