Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:51 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Your results will vary by cell line. Some cells withstand the -80
storage better than others. In general -80 is not good for primary
cells, although I think some very proliferative cells can take it.
Also consider that viability isn't the only problem. If your
recovery rate is very low you increase the chances of establishing a
cell line that is phenotypically distinct from the original. You see
this a lot with PC12 cells. If you have no choice I'd wager that the
quality of the freezing could improve your recovery even if you are
storing at -80. Try one of the devices for slowly freezing vials.
Corning and fisher sell a slow freezing cooler that you put in the
-80 to achieve a gradual cool down.
On Apr 20, 2007, at 1:50 PM, Prabhakar Pandian wrote:
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> Hello,
> Can anyone tell me how long one can store mammalian cells in
> a -80
> freezer without the use of liquid nitrogen.
>
> We are looking for a short term storage (3-6 months) for continuous
> use of
> primary cells and cells lines, but don't have access to liquid
> nitrogen
> storage. Hence this solution of freezing batches in -80 freezer.
>
> Also does it make a difference using whether a -80 or a -86 freezer.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Prabhakar
>
|
|
|