Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:46:01 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
We have Prior H70. It's quite good but seems to work better when controlled directly from hyperterminal. You can always call Prior and get help with hyperterminal commands.
Michael Model, Ph.D.
Confocal Microscopy Core,
Department of Biological Sciences,
Kent State University,
Kent, OH 44242
________________________________
From: Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Fred E. Indig, Ph.D.
Sent: Thu 7/5/2007 12:32 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: automated XY stage
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Dear Microscopists,
We are considering the purchase of an automated XY stage for our
non-confocal microscope. It is important for us to be able to return
(at a different occasion) to the same precise area of the slide that
we had viewed, using the XY co-ordinates.
The vendor has recommended LUDL. Has anyone any positive or negative
comments on the current products of Ludl? Can anyone recommend an
automated XY stage made by a different company?
Please contact me directly if that is more convenient.
Thank you,
Fred
--
Fred E. Indig, Ph.D.
Head, Confocal Imaging Unit
Research Resources Branch
National Institute on Aging/NIH
5600 Nathan Shock Dr.
Baltimore, MD 21224-6825
Tel. 410-558-8173
Fax 410-558-8236
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|