Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Hi Prof. Don,
I am posting this references related to confocal transmission with DIC
on behalf of Prof. Colin Sheppard.
Cogswell CJ, O'Byrne JW (1992) A high resolution confocal transmission
microscope: I. System design. Proceedings of SPIE, 1660, 503-511
Cogswell CJ, Larkin KG, O'Byrne JW, Arnison MR (1994) High resolution,
multiple optical mode confocal microscope: I. System design, image
acquisition and 3D visualization, Proceedings of SPIE, 2184, 48-54
Cogswell CJ, Chapter 30: Confocal microscopy with transmitted light,
pages, 479-487, The Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy 2nd
edition, ISBN 0-306-44826-2, J. Pawley, ed. Plenum Press, New York,
Library of Congress cataloging (1995)
M.R. Arnison, P.W. Fekete, M. Serrano, Phuong Thuc Anh Nguyen, Raniero
Romagnoli, Ling Guan, J.W. O'Byrne, C.J. Cogswell, Transmission
confocal microscopy: making it a reality, Proc. SPIE 3261, 50-59
(1998) - 27-29 January 1998
I would also like to have a copy of compiled bibliography! thanks.
Cheers,
Shalin
On 7/18/07, Donald M. O'Malley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> Hi Y'all,
>
> Thanks to everyone for sending me refs both on-line and
> off-line. I will compile a bibliography of those, along with
> the other references I am putting in the review, the focus of
> which is how deep different imaging modalities can image
> (which is of course sample dependent; I will discuss limits
> and trade offs).
>
> I will provide back the bibliography as soon as it is done
> and I will also provide a preprint after the manuscript has
> been reviewed.
>
> One bit of information that I have not come across is how
> deep DIC can image. With a turbid sample, not very deep
> of course. But with more transparent specimens, I presume
> one could go pretty deep, but I have not run across
> references discussing the issue. Alternatively any examples
> of where DIC has been used to look in depth into tissues or
> animals would be equally useful.
>
> A second bit of information concerns "DIC Confocal". I am not
> sure if this actually exists or if it has been used to any substantive
> effect. Because the crossed polarizers cut down a lot of the
> light in regular DIC, I would think that by combining it with confocal,
> one would be hurting for photons and have difficulty creating
> contrast (assuming this makes any sense at all--I am but a simple
> caveman neurobiologist!).
>
> Thanks again for all the help!
> Don
> 617-373-2284
>
> p.s. I did not ask for confocal reviews cause I have lots of those,
> but do feel free to send me favorites in this genre as well.
>
> Donald M. O'Malley
> Associate Professor
> Dept. Biology
> Northeastern University
>
--
My co-ordinates:
Shalin Mehta, Graduate student
Graduate Programme in Bioengineering, NUS, Singapore
Email: shalin {dot} mehta {at} gmail {dot} com
Blog: electricsbm.blogspot.com
Mobile: +65 90694182
|
