CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

July 2007

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ian Dobbie <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:26:29 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Shalin Mehta <[log in to unmask]> writes:

> Search the CONFOCAL archive at http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=
> confocal Hello Sarah,
>
>  The emission spectrum in 2-p case will be the same as 1-p case. I am sending
> the TIFF to you. Interestingly, when I used the beads with 2-p excitation I
> found that they melted when I tried to acquire experimental PSF in blue
> region. They seem to be poor emitters in blue region. Additionally, they emit
> the signal in blue,green, red region (with increasing intensity in that order)
> - it is a tell-tale sign that they are made up of QDs.

It would really surprise me if Tetra-speck beads were quantum dots. I
have used them for about 10 years, and 10 years ago QDs were basically
non-existent.

Ian

ATOM RSS1 RSS2