Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:29:47 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Hey everyone..this is my first time using this server. I am a new research
assistant working in the department of bioengineering at Stanford
University and I have a few questions regarding Microscope Stage
Incubators.
My group plans to study live corneal epithelial cell migration and
proliferation (and possibly other cell characteristics) on transparent
hydrogels over a period of 1 to 4 days. We plan to use 10 ro 20x
objectives so it will be a long working distance. As an undergrad, I
performed live cell imaging with a microscope stage incubator on a leica
microscope, so I have some experiene in the area. I am in charge of
determining which microscope stage incubator is best for our application.
We have a Nikon TE300 with an Applied Scientific Instruments MS-2000
stage.
There appears to be two different microscope stage incubation systems: hood
incubators and stage incubators. I have spoken to a variety of companies
with conflicting recommendations, although I am leaning towards a Stage
incubator from OKO-labs. Any suggestions if a hood or a stage incubator is
better? Has anyone had success or been disapointed with certain companies
hoods or stage incubators?
I would greatly appreciate any help.
Sincerely,
Charles Blaha M.S.
Department of Bioengineering
Stanford University
|
|
|