CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

November 2007

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Glass Cleaner
From:
Vickery Trinkaus-Randall <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:48:43 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

I use the diluted form
Vickery

nathan witherspoon wrote:

> Search the CONFOCAL archive at 
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
> I have been told that Sparkle is the glass cleaner of choice for 
> cleaning objectives because it will not eat away coatings.
> I just noticed on the bottle we have that it says Sparkle can be 
> diluted "one part water to two parts Sparkle."
> So does everyone dilute it or use the pure form?  Does it really matter?
>
> Thanks,
> Nathan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2