Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:42:37 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Not 0.3 but 1/3 of course
-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Judy Trogadis
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 11:03 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: image processing
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
I have a simple question, related to an annoying problem.
I have an image of a multilabelled fluorescent specimen, displayed as a
merged RGB image. I would like to analyze just the red channel, so I
split the channels and obtain B & W images of the individual component.
They all look as bright as the original.
However, if I only have a single red image and would like to convert it
to a B & W image (change mode RGB to grey), for 8-bit analysis in
ImageJ, for example, the resulting image is very dull and fainter.
Furthermore, this effect is much more dramatic with a red image than
with a green image.
What is happening?
Thanks,
Judy
Judy Trogadis
Bio-Imaging Coordinator
St. Michael's Hospital, 7Queen
30 Bond St.
Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
ph: 416-864-6060 x6337
pager: 416-685-9219
fax: 416-864-6043
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|