Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:57:16 +0200 |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Hye all,
There is a lot if good information about that subject in the microscopy site.
http://www.microscopyu.com/articles/digitalimaging/colorbalance.html
John Russ, is also a man with lot of practical experience in this
field. He wrote a book on Image processing and several good reviews on
color photography.
Bye,
Patrick Van Oostveldt
Quoting Judy Trogadis <[log in to unmask]>:
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> I have a simple question, related to an annoying problem.
>
> I have an image of a multilabelled fluorescent specimen, displayed
> as a merged RGB image. I would like to analyze just the red channel,
> so I split the channels and obtain B & W images of the individual
> component. They all look as bright as the original.
>
> However, if I only have a single red image and would like to convert
> it to a B & W image (change mode RGB to grey), for 8-bit analysis
> in ImageJ, for example, the resulting image is very dull and
> fainter. Furthermore, this effect is much more dramatic with a red
> image than with a green image.
>
> What is happening?
> Thanks,
> Judy
>
>
> Judy Trogadis
> Bio-Imaging Coordinator
> St. Michael's Hospital, 7Queen
> 30 Bond St.
> Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
> ph: 416-864-6060 x6337
> pager: 416-685-9219
> fax: 416-864-6043
> [log in to unmask]
>
--
Dep. Moleculaire Biotechnologie
Coupure links 653
B 9000 GENT
tel 09 264 5969
fax 09 264 6219
|
|
|