Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 9 Apr 2008 17:48:02 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Calcein-AM is better FDA for labeling the cell interior. Calcein has 4
negative charges (maybe five) and is well retained. Also, calcein unlike
FDA is insensitive to physiological pH changes.
John
Randy Learish wrote:
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> On this topic, I was wondering how well the chloro-methylated dyes are
> retained. The Probes handbook says these dyes have "mild" thiol-reactivity
> which would explain why the Tracker dyes are better retained in living cells.
> But does that mean they actually cross-link to proteins? If I lysed the cells
> after labeling, would I see fluorescently labeled proteins on SDS-PAGE?
>
> Randy
>
>
>
--
John J. Lemasters, MD, PhD
Professor and South Carolina COEE Endowed Chair
Director, Center for Cell Death, Injury and Regeneration
Departments of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Medical University of South Carolina
QF308 Quadrangle Building
280 Calhoun Street, MSC 140
Charleston, SC 29425
Office: 843-792-2153
Lab: 843-792-3530
Fax: 843-792-1617
Email: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|