CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

April 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Apr 2008 17:48:02 -0400
Reply-To:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
From:
"John J. Lemasters" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Calcein-AM is better FDA for labeling the cell interior. Calcein has 4 
negative charges (maybe five) and is well retained. Also, calcein unlike 
FDA is insensitive to physiological pH changes.

John

Randy Learish wrote:
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> On this topic, I was wondering how well the chloro-methylated dyes are 
> retained.  The Probes handbook says these dyes have "mild" thiol-reactivity 
> which would explain why the Tracker dyes are better retained in living cells.  
> But does that mean they actually cross-link to proteins?  If I lysed the cells 
> after labeling, would I see fluorescently labeled proteins on SDS-PAGE?
>
> Randy
>
>
>   

-- 
John J. Lemasters, MD, PhD
Professor and South Carolina COEE Endowed Chair
Director, Center for Cell Death, Injury and Regeneration
Departments of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Medical University of South Carolina
QF308 Quadrangle Building
280 Calhoun Street, MSC 140
Charleston, SC 29425

Office: 843-792-2153
Lab: 843-792-3530
Fax: 843-792-1617
Email: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2