CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

July 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:12:51 +0200
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
Re: Classification of confocal microscopes
From:
Michael Weber <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Organization:
MPI-CBG
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Juan,

a multiphoton system is not confocal. For which purpose do you need the 
classification?

Michael



Juan Luis Ribas wrote:
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
> 
> Dear all,
> It's just a theoretical question. Can multiphoton microscopes be 
> classified as confocal microscopes?
> Is there any reference published about this type of microscope 
> classification?
> 
> Thank you very much in advance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2