Some time ago I used XCOSM   http://www.essrl.wustl.edu/~preza/xcosm/
under linux (with graphical user interface), and also in command-line mode on 
a Windows machine with cygwin installed.
I did not do any extensive tests, for my few samples I was quite satisfied with 
the results. The best algorithm (Expectation Maximization) has very slow 
convergence, so you need hundreds or thousands of iterations (= a lot of 
time).
I liked the results better than those from the commercial AutoDeblur v. 9.2 
package (Blind deconvolution), but on the other hand, there the deconvolution 
took about 1/10th of the time.

Sincerely,
Stan Vitha

Microscopy and Imaging Center, 
Texas A&M University
 
: 
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:35:13 +0100, Johan Henriksson 
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Neeraj Gohad wrote:
>> Dear List,
>>
>> We are trying to compare open source deconvolution algorithms with the
>> commercial deconvolution package that we have. So far we have tried the
>> Iterative Deconvolve 3D for ImageJ. I wanted to know which other open
>> source algorithms people are using for deconvolution.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>
>haven't tried yet:
>http://piotr.wendykier.googlepages.com/iterativedeconvolution
>
>also used your package there, it failed, and since imagej has problems
>with batching I wouldn't bother with IJ plugins for it anyway. I have
>used my own code in the past, but for special classes of deconv, not the
>normal one in biology. we're writing a new algorithm at the moment.
>
>/Johan
>
>--
>--
>------------------------------------------------
>Johan Henriksson
>MSc Engineering
>PhD student, Karolinska Institutet
>http://mahogny.areta.org http://www.endrov.net