CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

November 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:10:19 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
On 28 Nov 2008 at 18:00, Johan Henriksson wrote:

> Martin Spitaler wrote:
> > Just a note because WinXP-64bit discussions were on here before: Even
> > if the software doesn't support 64 bit, it should run faster because
> > the the 'virtual memory' the software is using (beyond 3GB) is
> > actually stored in RAM rather than on the harddrive.
> this sounds really off to me. virtual memory works by taking a block of
> memory and putting it on the harddrive. the address does not change,
> there will simply be nothing to where it points. hence virtual memory
> *does not* extend your limit past 2gb or 3gb, whatever your OS has.

But how about a RAM-disc? 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2