CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

February 2009

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:44:28 +0100
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: colocalization question
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Jose Viña <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines) 
Cameron Nowell wrote:

> That means that your proteins could be 200nm apart and still "colocalise".

Some images to illustrate that can be found at
http://support.svi.nl/wiki/BlurAndNoiseAffectColocalization

Maybe Dr. Nowell wants to quote that email in that wiki article!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2