Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Date: |
Wed, 27 May 2009 10:25:02 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Does the paper mention any spectral unmixing? I know that some software can mathematically separate GFP and YFP, but proving that you've done it correctly would be tough. A lot of variables on both the technical and algorithmic techniques.
I've seen spectral unmixing performed to separate GFP-YFP signals, but only when the labels were distinct. I also am interested how one proves GFP-YFP colocalization, since there are people here who would like to do that as well.
~Gregg
Gregg Sobocinski
Imaging Specialist/Microscopist
University of Michigan, MCDB Dept.
Ann Arbor, Michigan
USA
-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Howard Berg
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 9:15 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: GFP/YFP colocalization?
Hi all:
A paper for ''The Plant Cell'' (Raffaele et al.) just came online and
several figures are presented showing colocalization of GFP and YFP-
tagged proteins. I am not surprised that they colocalized because I
expect there would be a severe bleedthrough for these two. Am I
missing something here or have they presented an artifact? Their
methods state that they used sequential acquisition (on a Leica TCS
SP2).
Howard
R. Howard Berg, Ph.D.
Director, Integrated Microscopy Facility
Danforth Plant Science Center
975 N. Warson Rd.
St. Louis, MO 63132
ph 314-587-1261 fx 314-587-1361 cell 314-378-2409
[log in to unmask] www.danforthcenter.org
visit this educational resource: http://www.danforthcenter.org/Cells/
|
|
|