CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

July 2009

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Alessandro Esposito <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:40:54 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Dear Guy, 
   we fully agree, I may have explained myself not correctly. I was just 
mentioning that time-gating with a few time windows is slightly less photon 
efficient, but can provide faster acquisition times. It provide less information 
content per counted photons, but can count a higher number of photons.

It is a couple of years that B&H claims thay can detect lifetimes that fast, but 
I guess this can happen only with their multi-detector system and I personally 
never met anybody that got a TCSPC (good) image in a few seconds.

Cheers, 

Alessandro

ATOM RSS1 RSS2