CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

July 2009

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Periasamy, Ammasi (ap3t)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:45:11 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)
Hi Alexey
Yes, Dr. Wolfgang Becker is right and the fixative produce additional problems in the lifetime measurements.
Unfortunately for some of the biological experiment it is difficult to use the live samples. SO, currently we are working on it...how to overcome or correct the issues involved in lifetime measurement using the fixed samples versus live.
We will post the results soon.
Best,
Ammasi


Ammasi Periasamy, Ph.D.
Director, Keck Center for Cellular Imaging (KCCI)
Professor of Biology and Biomedical Engineering
Biology, Gilmer Hall (064), McCormick Rd
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA 22904
Voice: 434-243-7602 (Office); 982-4869 (lab)
Fax:434-982-5210; Email:[log in to unmask]
http//:www.kcci.virginia.edu
************************
Workshop on FRET Microscopy, March 9-13, 2010
http://www.kcci.virginia.edu/workshop/workshop2010/index.php
*************************


-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kozlenkov, Alexey
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 8:03 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: time-domain FLIM-FRET with fixed samples

Dear all,


here is a question from a newbie venturing into the field of 2photon
FLIM-FRET measurements.

I'm considering using the Becker-Hickl time-domain FLIM / LSM NLO system
to measure FRET between some membrane proteins, fused to CFP and YFP.
The FLIM-based approach looked like an attractive option since it should
allow for analysing cells with not too highly expressed proteins of
interest, thus reducing the risk of obtaining FRET due only to membrane
overcrowding.
However, since my proteins are partially present in a highly motile pool
of vesicles, I intended to use fixed cell samples (as FLIM would require
some tens of seconds for one measurement).

Now, to my question: 
The Becker-Hickl TCSPC handbook by Wolfgang Becker makes a strong point
of NOT using fixed samples for FLIM-FRET, due to changes in lifetimes
and strongly double-exponential decay profiles. However, other
publications, such as a protocol in the Molecular Cloning "Bible", do
use fixed samples for FLIM-FRET. Thus, I would welcome any comments or
advice from the community about this matter. Is fixed sample FLIM-FRET
really not recommended, and if it is not true, what would be the best
methodology to use (and pitfalls to avoid). How important would be the
choice of particular fluorescent protein, fixation methods and mounting
media? Obviously, I would also be grateful for links to good reviews and
experimental publications that I might have missed.


Thanks in advance,

Alex

=============================

Alexey Kozlenkov, PhD
Molecular Physiology of Somatic Sensation
Max-Delbruck Centrum for Molecular Medicine
13125 Berlin
Germany
+49 (0)30 9406 3212

ATOM RSS1 RSS2